Michael Jordan was the third repeat cover player.Blake Griffin, Kevin Durant, Derrick RoseFirst cover to feature multiple players.LeBron JamesThe Miami Heat were the defending champions, and appeared in the 2014 NBA Finals.Kevin DurantFourth repeat cover player, first solo appearance.Stephen Curry, James Harden, Anthony DavisSpecial Edition: Michael JordanAll three covers were available as an insert in the regular edition, so that they could be swapped according to preference. First Special Edition, featuring the third cover for Michael Jordan.Paul GeorgeLegend Edition: Kobe BryantPaul George was previously the 'cover' player for the MyNBA2K16 companion app. Hella scoring, regardless of how tight the defense is, they'll find a way.Second cover for Kobe Bryant.Kyrie IrvingLegend Edition: Shaquille O'NealCanada: DeMar DeRozanKyrie Irving previously appeared on the cover of. We know how it is when Curry and Durant get hot. (they combined for like 100 points) so the main scorers were just hot, that's all. So if anything, it was really Curry/Klay/Durant doing all the main work with Draymond's passes/defense on the side. Durant pulled out with a nearly 30 point triple-double. 'if he was shooting so much other guys would’ve shot and scored too.' what? Do you mean: 'if he wasn't because the bench was inconsistent, especially on the defensive end. As for the 'would've had 93' I know that he still went off had he not, they probably would've had some in the late 80s, early 90s. That's a horrible assumption, so 'chill the fuck out' with that. The only reason why there were so many wides on the Wizard's side is because of the fact that they were being stupid and attempted to double Curry.Īnd 'kid' stop making assumptions when you don't even know my age. I watched the entire game via tv, not on Twitch and I saw some defensive plays, especially some decent or even solid ones from the Wizards who attempted to stop Curry when he was going off for 18 in the 1st. And he had 21 in the first which means they'd dropped 35 together as a team which is near average, maybe slightly above. Warriors would've had 93 had Curry not had any points or didn't pop off 51. If you remove the 51 points he had and the fact that he had like 21 in the first quarter: Reminder: Curry scored 51 of the Warrior's 144, so I wouldn't really say it was 'bad' defense. Near the middle-end of the 3rd, the pace of the game slowed and that's because Stephen stopped playing near the end of the 3rd and never got back in. Stephen just went off early and the benches for both teams were the cause of the 'awful defense' which is surprising, because Curry started and played just about every quarter other than the 4th. Don't come onto the internet making assumptions about peoples ages when you're probably younger than them.Īs for my reply based on that message with your spacial error: There was barely any bad defense if you actually watch the full on game and not just the highlights. 'Kid' How do you know if I'm a kid? And no, I won't shut the fuck up until you learn how to put a space in between of your words and numbers.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |